Live community results

What circumcised men say about their results

Explore satisfaction, recovery, sensation, circumcision styles and whether respondents would make the same choice again.

Take the survey
Circumcised respondents

Satisfaction at a glance

Showing 1350 of 1350 circumcised responses after filters.

1349 historical responses · 1 new Cut Lads responses
73%
Satisfied overall
Satisfied or very satisfied · n=1350
100%
Satisfied with appearance
Answered n=1
68%
Would choose it again
Answered n=1350
84%
No listed complication
Answered n=1350

Overall satisfaction

How respondents feel about being circumcised overall

0200400600800VerydissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeithersatisfied nordissatisfiedSatisfiedVery satisfied

Change in sexual sensation

For respondents able to compare before and after

070140210280Much worseWorseNo noticeablechangeBetterMuch better

Recovery time

How long until the wound felt mostly healed

012342–4 weeks

Recovery pain

Self-reported overall pain during recovery

085170255340Very littleMildModerateHighVery high
100%
Would recommend adult circumcision
82%
No revision procedure
100%
Tightness feels about right
69%
Satisfied with sensation

Why respondents were circumcised

Main reason selected

085170255340MedicalReligiousCulturalFamily choicePersonalchoiceAppearanceOther

Age at circumcision

When the procedure took place

0200400600800Under 1 year13–17 years1–12 years(legacy survey)13–18 years(legacy survey)19+ years(legacy survey)
Lube and everyday experience

Lubricant use after circumcision

These newer questions separate needing lubricant from simply preferring to use it. Older survey responses were not asked these questions.

Need for lube during masturbation

How often respondents say lubricant is needed

Not enough data yet.

Need for lube during sex

How often respondents say lubricant is needed

Not enough data yet.

Choosing to use lube

Even when it is not strictly needed

Not enough data yet.

Preferred lube type

Most-used preference among respondents

Not enough data yet.

Revisions

Are respondents considering a revision?

Considering a revision

New survey responses only

Not enough data yet.

Current tightness feels

Useful context when thinking about revisions

01234About right
Styles

Satisfaction by circumcision style

Style combines scar height and tightness. Small samples can move sharply as new responses arrive.

Low & Tight
77%
satisfied overall · answered n=504
High & Tight
75%
satisfied overall · answered n=444
High & Loose
65%
satisfied overall · answered n=199
Low & Loose
76%
satisfied overall · answered n=139
Ultra-low & Ultra-tight
100%
satisfied overall · answered n=1
Practical recovery information

What people considering circumcision may want to know

Complications
84%

of filtered respondents selected no listed complication requiring treatment or causing a recognised recovery problem.

Revisions
18%

reported at least one revision procedure. This survey does not establish why a revision was needed.

Choose again
68%

said they would choose circumcision again if they could make the decision now.

People still deciding

What uncut and considering respondents want to know

This helps shape the information, forums and clinic content on Cut Lads.

No considering responses yet.

Thinking about circumcision?

Use the results to understand other people's experiences, then speak to a qualified clinician about your own circumstances. Community survey results cannot predict your individual outcome.

Find clinics

How to read these results

Cut Lads is an open, self-selected community survey. Respondents choose to take part, answers are self-reported, and the sample may not represent all circumcised men. This dashboard currently combines 1349 anonymised responses imported from the earlier Global Circumcision Survey with 1 responses collected through the new Cut Lads survey. Older respondents were not asked every newer question, so each percentage uses only people who answered that specific measure. Percentages describe the people who answered the survey, not the medical probability of a particular outcome. Raw member-linked responses remain private.